Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thor Granitos e Mármores LTDA.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thor Granitos e Mármores LTDA.[edit]
- Thor Granitos e Mármores LTDA. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The improvement and marketing of ornamental rocks, fails notability. Waterjuice (talk) 14:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Could be speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G11 or possibly as a copyright violation under WP:CSD#G12: I can't read the page, but Google finds the same text in http://www.thorgranitos.com.br/br/historico.swf. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - take your choice of speedies - I'd say WP:CSD#A7, non-notable company. JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is the English language wikipedia, we shouldn't be trying to usurp the place of other wikipedias from poor countries.Yobmod (talk) 11:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as G11, and so tagged. My Portuguese is pretty weak, but I can read enough to see things like they'll "give your customers the best care".--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.